当前位置: 首页  Opinion
Who Is Responsible for It?
发布时间:2015-06-10 浏览次数:

 

Who Is Responsible for It?

 

Have you noticed that Square dance has become a popular recreational activity across China, especially among dama? Just as dama has become a term many use to jocularly describe middle age or elderly women, Square Dance has become a funny activity for some.In the meanwhile, there are a number of people especially the young rejecting Square dance, which is considered boring as well as noisy. Now, it’s time to free Square dance of the bad name and hold the scale even.

 

Square dance is a low-cost, convenient physical exercise for many women and plays an important role in developing countries like China. China has more than 200 million people aged 60 or above. And those old people can remain physically healthy by taking part in Square dance, easing the burden on health care system. In fact, it is also confirmed that dancing is beneficial to mental health. Evidence indicates that physical activities and exercise could improve self-image, social skills and cognitive functioning. They could also reduce symptoms of anxiety and physiological response to stress. And such activities are even more beneficial when done socially, in a friendly group. On the surface, it seems that there is nothing wrong with dama. They just want to keep fit. Really? On 26th October 2103, Mr. Zhang was too desperate to tolerate the noise that dama made, and he poured excrement to dama. With conflicts coming into being, more and more people are fighting against Square dance. Owing to Square dance, they can’t have a good rest, thus becoming tired of work. Alright, everyone their own sayings.Then, who is responsible for the conflict?

 

As far as I am concerned, the government is responsible for the conflicts in some degree. The government should set free places aside for dama at the beginning, in which Dama can enjoy themselves. Relatively the opponents reach their goals and the conflicts will fade out gradually. In a word, what disturbed dama and the opponents was that both side can not communicate on time. If they had expressed their ideas ahead of timedealing with the conflicts with a peaceful way, there would have been no misunderstanding.

 

(Editor: WangSa Source: English Net)

 

what's new?